Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.
Citations
- 119 U.S. 625
- 7 S. Ct. 336
- 30 L. Ed. 501
- 1887 U.S. LEXIS 1927
Syllabus
<p>■A fixed structure, contrived for the purpose of taking ships out of the • ■ water in order to repair them, and for no other purpose, consisting of a-large oblong box, with a flat bottom and perpendicular sides, with no means of • propulsion either by wind, steam, or .otherwise, and not de- • signed for navigation, but only as. a floating dry-dock, permanently moored, is not a subject of salvage service,.'</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a libel against a drydock 1 does not fall within the admiralty jurisdiction of the federal courts
- holding that a floating drydock permanently fixed to a wharf was not a “vessel”
- holding that floating docks are considered to be extensions of land
- finding that a moored dry dock was not a vessel for purposes of a salvage claim in admiralty
- noting that “[a] ship or vessel, used for navigation and commerce, though lying at a wharf, and temporarily made fast thereto, as well as her furniture and cargo, are maritime subjects”
- explaining that a fixed structure, such as a dry-dock, is not used for the purpose of navigation any more so than a wharf or warehouse that projects upon water
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bradley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Supreme Court· 2005-02-22· cited 221×
- The Robert W. ParsonsSupreme Court· 1903-10-26· cited 141×
- Robert Bernard v. Binnings Construction Co., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1984-09-17· cited 114×
- Lozman v. City of Riviera BeachSupreme Court· 2013-01-15· cited 107×
- David Burchett and Cheryl Burchett v. Cargill, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee v. Marine Equipment Management CorporationFifth Circuit· 1995-05-11· cited 99×
- Robert D. Cook v. Belden Concrete Products, Inc., Division of Rockwin CorporationFifth Circuit· 1973-03-12· cited 90×
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEST INDIES TRANSPORT, INC.; WIT EQUIPMENT CO., INC.; And W. JAMES OELSNER, AppellantsThird Circuit· 1997-10-15· cited 86×
- The Steamship JeffersonSupreme Court· 1909-11-29· cited 72×
- Herman Fields v. Pool Offshore, Inc., Pool Company, Incorrectly Sued as Pool Offshore, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2000-02-22· cited 60×
- Gonsalves v. Moose Dry Dock & Repair Co.Supreme Court· 1924-11-17· cited 59×
- Evansville & Bowling Green Packet Co. v. Chero Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court· 1926-04-12· cited 58×
- Long Island Owner's Ass'n v. DavidsonTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1998-04-23· cited 50×
- Louis L. Atkins v. Greenville Shipbuilding CorporationFifth Circuit· 1969-05-12· cited 49×
- Royal Insurance Company of America v. Pier 39 Limited Partnership, Etc.Ninth Circuit· 1984-07-24· cited 43×
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great American InsuranceS.D. New York· 2014-03-31· cited 43×
- South Port Marine, LLC v. Gulf Oil Ltd. PartnershipFirst Circuit· 2000-12-07· cited 41×
- Arabie J. Manuel v. P.A.W. Drilling & Well Service, Inc. Westwood Insurance Company, Ltd.Fifth Circuit· 1998-03-02· cited 39×
- Don W. Kathriner v. Unisea, Inc., a Washington CorporationNinth Circuit· 1992-09-17· cited 38×
- In Re the Complaint of Sedco, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1982-03-30· cited 35×
- United States v. Moran Towing & Transportation Company, Incorporated, United States of America v. Bethlehem Steel CompanyFourth Circuit· 1967-02-10· cited 33×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.