Cooper v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an arrest and search was permissible under 14.01(b), because the “smell of marihuana supplies probable cause for an officer to believe that an offense is being committed in his presence”
• stating the smell of marihuana supplies probable cause for a police officer to believe that an offense is being committed in his presence and gives the officer probable cause to search for marihuana
• experienced officer's testimony as to identity of substance as marijuana is sufficient to establish identity of contraband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• A.A. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-04· cited 38×
• Cooper v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-01· cited 14×
• McGee v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-06-15· cited 12×
• AA v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-04· cited 1×
• William Douglas Ellard II v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-05-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crocker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-10· cited 336×
• Razo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-24· cited 126×
• Moore v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-18· cited 120×
• Isam v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-02· cited 83×
• Miller v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-11-11· cited 68×
• Lejeune v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-07-14· cited 68×
• Carmouche v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-07-14· cited 50×