Skip to main content

Miller v. State

Citations

  • 330 S.W.2d 466
  • 168 Tex. Crim. 570
  • 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that probation officer = s five-month delay in reporting appellant = s violation did not preclude its use as a basis for revocation
  • holding that probation officer’s five-month delay in reporting appellant’s violation did not preclude its use as a basis for revocation
  • holding that probation officer’s five-month delay in reporting appellant’s violation did not preclude its use as a basis for revocation
  • both witnesses previously used cocaine extensively
  • narcotics officer's identification testimony sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dice, Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.