Cooley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Crawford did not overrule the unbroken line of cases holding that the Confrontation Clause does not operate to exclude pretrial statements made by a witness who actually testifies at trial”
• holding that “Crawford did not overrule the unbroken line of cases holding that the Confrontation Clause does not operate to exclude pretrial statements made by a witness who actually testifies at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Tennessee v. Jessie Dotson
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2014-09-30· cited 179×
• State v. Carothers
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-01-26· cited 33×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-03· cited 16×
• State of Tennessee v. Kevin Allen Fleming
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2018-03-22