Linda Love v. Re/max of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that writing memo with attached copy of Equal Pay Act to company president requesting a raise was protected activity
• noting that the Fair Labor Standards Act, of which the EPA is a part, prohibits retaliation
• addressing “protected activity” element 1 under Title VII and holding that its decision was “equally sustainable under the [FLSA]”
• upholding plaintiff’s recovery on a discriminatory retaliation claim even though the district court did not find that RE/MAX discriminated due to the plaintiff’s sex
• affirming decision that employee’s termination was retaliatory even though the employer had not actually violated any wage laws concerning her salary
• noting Section 15(a)(3) protects employees who make internal complaints to employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).