Cook v. Winfrey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a plaintiff must allege “action by the interfering party directed towards the party with whom the plaintiff expects to do business”
• rejecting plaintiff’s claim of intentional interference because he made only “general assertions” with respect to whom he would have done business with
• “Unfulfilled hopes cannot be the basis for a claim of tortious interference with prospective economic advantage____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).