Arizona Supreme Court· 10/31/1984
Cook v. Cook
Citations
- 691 P.2d 664
- 142 Ariz. 573
- 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that valid agreements supported by proper consideration between unmarried cohabitants will be enforced by the courts according to the intent of the parties
- holding in part that unmarried cohabiting couples could enter enforceable agreements to pool their income and divide assets
- relying on the Restatement (Second) of Contracts for principles of contract formation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Blumenthal v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court· 2017-01-25· cited 110×
- Salzman v. BachrachSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-03-20· cited 85×
- Carroll v. LeeArizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-06· cited 70×
- Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-04-19· cited 60×
- Marriage of Muchesko v. MucheskoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-30· cited 47×
- Lincoln v. LincolnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-08-11· cited 46×
- Wilcox v. TrautzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-04-21· cited 31×
- Hudson v. DeLonjayMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-06-23· cited 25×
- Nickerson v. Green Valley Recreation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-11-30· cited 24×
- Blumenthal v. BrewerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-02-09· cited 16×
- Goode v. GoodeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-07-20· cited 14×
- Smith v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-10-06· cited 11×
- Devaney v. L'ESPERANCESupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-06-17· cited 11×
- Layton v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-07-05· cited 8×
- Coast to Coast Manufacturing v. Carnes Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-03-18· cited 5×
- Custom Roofing Co., Inc. v. AllingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-07-09· cited 5×
- R.L.M. Dist. Co. v. W.A. Taylor, Inc.D. Arizona· 1988-01-04· cited 2×
- Dalton v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-03-12· cited 2×
- Carroll v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-06-24· cited 1×
- State Farm v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-03-21
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-12-27· cited 396×
- Hewitt v. HewittIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-09-19· cited 111×
- Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 76×
- In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court· 1972-07-27· cited 53×
- Kinkenon v. HueNebraska Supreme Court· 1981-01-16· cited 48×
- West v. KnowlesWashington Supreme Court· 1957-05-16· cited 38×
- Stevens v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court· 1953-05-11· cited 36×
- Knauer v. KnauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-16· cited 33×
- Fernandez v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court· 1960-07-19· cited 33×
- Cross v. CrossArizona Supreme Court· 1963-05-16· cited 25×
- Galbraith v. JohnstonArizona Supreme Court· 1962-07-30· cited 22×
- Garcia v. VenegasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-08-30· cited 20×
- Malcoff v. CoyierCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-05-18· cited 19×
- Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona York Refrigeration Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-05-25· cited 18×
- Garza v. FernandezArizona Supreme Court· 1952-10-09· cited 12×
- Bridges v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-05-19· cited 9×
- Weak v. WeakCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-04-20· cited 9×
- Lee v. SlovakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-06-11· cited 3×
- Cook v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-03-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.