Skip to main content
· 3/20/2000

Salzman v. Bachrach

Citations

  • 996 P.2d 1263
  • 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1325
  • 2000 Colo. LEXIS 458
  • 2000 WL 290499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a party’s unclean hands 36 should limit his relief unless the other party benefitted more from the deception
  • stating that unjust enrichment “does not depend on any contract, oral or written” and “does not require any promise or privity between the parties.”
  • noting the number of unmarried-couple households had increased 571% from 1970 to 1993 (citing Bureau of the Census, Marital Status and Living Arrangements: March 1993, VII–VIII, tbl.D (May 1994))
  • looking to.common law of other spates to help determine, public policy to be adopted in Colorado
  • collecting cases from other jurisdictions and noting that most jurisdictions now enforce contracts between cohabitants previously considered void as against public policy
  • collecting cases from other jurisdictions and noting that most jurisdictions now enforce contracts between cohabitants previously considered void as against public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kourlis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.