Contreras v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider an argument that evidence should have been excluded under Rule 403 when the appellant did not provide cogent argument or pertinent authority in support of his assertion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thompson v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2018-01-17· cited 26×
• Jones v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2019-04-23· cited 22×
• Bolin v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 2×
• Davis v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2005-08-15· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Ciaccio
  New York Court of Appeals· 1979-06-14· cited 223×
• Zabel v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1988-11-01· cited 77×
• Bradley v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1981-11-10· cited 73×
• Whiteplume v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1992-11-10· cited 53×
• McCone v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 50×
• Dike v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1999-11-30· cited 35×
• Dudley v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1998-01-14· cited 32×
• Warner v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1995-06-20· cited 26×
• Hamburg v. Heilbrun
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1995-03-08· cited 23×
• Vargas v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1998-07-29· cited 19×
• Wentworth v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1999-03-26· cited 11×
• People v. Alfonso
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-06-08· cited 8×