California Supreme Court· 4/30/1968
Continental Baking Co. v. Katz
Citations
- 68 Cal. 2d 512
- 439 P.2d 889
- 67 Cal. Rptr. 761
- 1968 Cal. LEXIS 286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We understand that in some legal systems it is assumed that documents are what they purport to be, unless shown to be otherwise. With us it is the other way around. Generally speaking, documents must be authenticated in some fashion before they are admissible in evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
176 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court· 1968-07-11· cited 846×
- People v. LindbergCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-08-28· cited 687×
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 347×
- College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-10-31· cited 338×
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-08-24· cited 310×
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-08-19· cited 200×
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-08-19· cited 170×
- IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-11-25· cited 162×
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-10-31· cited 157×
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 155×
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court· 1968-08-28· cited 153×
- McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-01-30· cited 140×
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-09-14· cited 123×
- People v. RusselCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-08-14· cited 119×
- People v. Pacific Land Research Co.California Supreme Court· 1977-09-29· cited 112×
- Paiva v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-11-26· cited 93×
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasS.D. New York· 1990-08-29· cited 90×
- American Indian Model Schools v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-06-23· cited 84×
- Gale v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-05-02· cited 80×
- People v. CheekCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 79×
Cites
63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-07-03· cited 7,961×
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court· 1965-06-17· cited 918×
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-10-27· cited 252×
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-02-06· cited 195×
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1866-07-01· cited 187×
- In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-01-24· cited 155×
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-01-31· cited 149×
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-10-16· cited 120×
- People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-11-20· cited 120×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-12-04· cited 120×
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-10-16· cited 117×
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-05-21· cited 101×
- Bambridge v. WestermanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-02-26· cited 73×
- Damiani v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-02-15· cited 68×
- Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-02-03· cited 67×
- Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-01-29· cited 65×
- De Godey v. GodeyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1870-07-01· cited 64×
- City of Vernon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-03-03· cited 63×
- Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-11-28· cited 60×
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-01-16· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.