District of Columbia· 3/27/2008
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ritter
Citations
- 539 F. Supp. 2d 368
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24081
- 2008 WL 803655
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting Conrail’s motion for relief upon reconsideration and holding that as a Special Court under the Rail Act, the court had jurisdiction to consider Conrail’s claims, which required an interpretation of a conveyance order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 12,961×
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court· 1938-02-28· cited 3,971×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 1,645×
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesD.C. Circuit· 1992-09-08· cited 1,322×
- United States v. HohriSupreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 628×
- William Hohri v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1986-02-12· cited 521×
- Akinseye v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2003-08-15· cited 501×
- Macharia, Merania v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2003-07-11· cited 441×
- General Motors Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2004-04-02· cited 400×
- Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 2007-06-14· cited 115×
- Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd.D.C. Circuit· 2003-01-17· cited 88×
- In Re: Gordon R. England, Secretary of the NavyD.C. Circuit· 2004-09-21· cited 76×
- Di Benedetto v. MorgenthauD.C. Circuit· 1945-03-05· cited 14×
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Reading Co.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act· 1987-01-27· cited 8×
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act· 1995-04-04· cited 8×
Other cases named Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ritter
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.