District of Columbia· 3/27/2008
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ritter
Citations
- 539 F. Supp. 2d 368
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24081
- 2008 WL 803655
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting Conrail’s motion for relief upon reconsideration and holding that as a Special Court under the Rail Act, the court had jurisdiction to consider Conrail’s claims, which required an interpretation of a conveyance order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.