Skip to main content

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ritter

Citations

  • 539 F. Supp. 2d 368
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24081
  • 2008 WL 803655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting Conrail’s motion for relief upon reconsideration and holding that as a Special Court under the Rail Act, the court had jurisdiction to consider Conrail’s claims, which required an interpretation of a conveyance order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.