Considine v. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that when ruling on a motion for summary judgment the nonmovant must have 30 days to present evidence showing the existence of a genuine issue of material fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• SPARRA v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY Et Al.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-03-25· cited 22×
• Considine v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-06-01· cited 14×
• Considine v. Murphy
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-26· cited 5×
• Chandler v. Rohner
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-11-23
• Cecily Considine v. George W. Murphy
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-26

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cameron v. Lang
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-06-25· cited 276×
• Anderson v. Flake
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-01-21· cited 80×
• Bonner v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-12-08· cited 29×
• Dearing v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-28· cited 18×
• Kidd v. Unger
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-01-15· cited 17×
• D.P.S. Industries, Inc. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-09-16· cited 10×
• Phillips v. McCroskey
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-08-21· cited 9×
• Vautrot v. West
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-03-01· cited 3×