Skip to main content
· 4/25/2013

Conservation Northwest v. Harris Sherman

Citations

  • 715 F.3d 1181
  • 43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20090
  • 2013 WL 1760807
  • 76 ERC (BNA) 1369
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deeming appellant’s argument waived as it was buried in the middle of a broader argument below such that the district court never ruled on it
  • “[A] district court may not approve a consent decree that ‘conflicts with or violates’ an applicable statute.”
  • “[A] district court 22 may not approve a consent decree that ‘conflicts with or violates’ an applicable statute[.]”
  • “[A] district court 22 may not approve a consent decree that ‘conflicts with or violates’ an applicable statute[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Tashima, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.