New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 7/1/1998
Connell v. Connell
Citations
- 313 N.J. Super. 426
- 712 A.2d 1266
- 1998 N.J. Super. LEXIS 318
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that inherited funds and the capacity to produce income may be used in calculating child support notwithstanding that party placed inheritance in a non-income producing asset
- explaining that child support should be calculated first utilizing the parties’ gross income as defined in the child support guidelines before undertaking an analysis of statutory factors for deviation
- court could impute income even when inheritance was invested in non-income producing real estate
- court could impute income even when inheritance was invested in non-income producing real estate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fall, Temporarily
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Foust v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-05-08· cited 78×
- Caplan v. CaplanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-01-27· cited 78×
- Isaacson v. IsaacsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-03-08· cited 57×
- Humphreys v. DeRossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-20· cited 45×
- Loro v. CollianoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-06-06· cited 41×
- Schwarz v. SchwarzNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-02-18· cited 37×
- Cody v. Evans-CodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-12-24· cited 24×
- Smith v. FreemanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-26· cited 23×
- Hudson v. HudsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-11-05· cited 18×
- Gardner v. YrttimaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-02-08· cited 18×
- Lasché v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-08-06· cited 13×
- Humphreys v. DeRossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-18· cited 11×
- Overbay v. OverbayNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-03-18· cited 11×
- In Re AMDSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-10-20· cited 1×
- Casteel v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-10-20· cited 1×
- Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1998-10-21
- Lasché v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18
- Hal Eugene Hill v. Liesa Francine HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2021-10-12
- Diament v. DiamentChester County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-02-02
- Fonseca Zayas v. Rodríguez MeléndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2011-01-14
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-06-11· cited 573×
- Pascale v. PascaleSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-10· cited 172×
- Zazzo v. ZazzoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-12-28· cited 51×
- Weitzman v. WeitzmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-10-27· cited 48×
- Aronson v. AronsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-01-16· cited 39×
- Zazzo v. ZazzoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-03-05· cited 36×
- Walton v. VisgilNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-06-12· cited 22×
- Stiffler v. StifflerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-05-15· cited 15×
- Cleveland v. ClevelandNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-06-25· cited 14×
- Italiano v. Rudkin (Italiano)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-10-31· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.