New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 3/8/2002
Isaacson v. Isaacson
Citations
- 792 A.2d 525
- 348 N.J. Super. 560
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the defendant failed to demonstrate \the children's needs . . . were not being satisfied absent the [requested] increased child support\
- supporting parent has the “right to participate in the development of an appropriate value system for a child” by limiting expenses to those that are reasonable
- noting the \maximum amount provided for in the guidelines should be 'supplemented' by an additional award determined through application of the statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a)\
- the \maximum amount provided for in the [G]uidelines should be 'supplemented' by an additional award determined through application of the statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a)\
- \We also recognize . . . that the law is not offended if there is some incidental benefit to A-4084-17T1 10 the custodial parent from increased child support payments.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Skillman, Carchman and Wells
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.