Supreme Court of Virginia· 1/14/1926
Connell v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 144 Va. 553
- 131 S.E. 196
- 1926 Va. LEXIS 272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the party discovering such testimony should call it to the attention of the trial court”
- \the party discovering such testimony should call it to the attention of the trial court\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Prentis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mundy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-05-01· cited 48×
- Taylor v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1947-09-03· cited 39×
- Blankenship v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1952-04-21· cited 16×
- Laurence Maria Smith, s/k/a Laurence Marie Smith v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2018-01-16· cited 16×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.