Commonwealth v. Zook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the totality of the circumstances the statement, \Can I use the phone to call my mother to see if she can get me an attorney?\ clearly invoked the right under Miranda to secure counsel
• holding that under the totality of the circumstances the statement, \Can I use the phone to call my mother to see if she can get me an attorney?\ clearly invoked the right under Miranda to secure counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Zook
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 102×
• Commonwealth v. Zook
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-11-28· cited 60×
• State v. Whitaker
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-07-24· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. Santiago
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-30· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Reed
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-06· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Hussey (No. 1)
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-07-15· cited 16×
• Com. v. Hernandez, R.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-01-17
• Commonwealth v. Yaroszeufski
  Carbon County Court of Common Pleas· 1991-03-18
• Commonwealth v. Rivera
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-05-17
• Commonwealth v. Tenney
  Crawford County Court of Common Pleas· 1993-03-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• Oregon v. Bradshaw
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
• Smith v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
• Commonwealth v. Hubble
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-16· cited 49×