Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Woods

Citations

  • 575 A.2d 601
  • 394 Pa. Super. 223
  • 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is no constitutional right to a court-appointed expert witness in PCRA proceedings and that trial courts maintain discretion concerning such appointments
  • vacating one of Woods’s inchoate convictions under Section 906, but declining to remand for resentencing because that conviction ran concurrently to his other inchoate conviction
  • noting that “recantation testimony is highly suspect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Johnson, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.