Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/6/2016

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Citations

147 A.3d 7
2016 Pa. Super. 144
2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 366
2016 WL 3612897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that an appellant waives his issue on appeal if he fails to present the claim with citations to relevant authority or develop the issue in a meaningful fashion capable of review
stating that “information contained in a witness’[s] criminal record is not within the Commonwealth’s exclusive control and, thus, not Brady material.”
explaining that when an appellant offers no citation to pertinent case law or other authority in support of an argument, the claim is waived
explaining when an appellant offers no citation to pertinent case law or other authority in support of an argument, the claim is waived
holding trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding gang testimony was nothing more than attempt by defendant to impugn victim’s character and that its effect would have been more prejudicial than probative and might have - 20 - J-A25036-20 confused jury
noting appellant waives issue on appeal if he fails to present claim with citations to relevant authority or develop issue in meaningful fashion capable of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Ott, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.