Commonwealth v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e decline to impose a -5- J-S71020-14 two-hour time limit when testing for the presence of controlled substances….”
• “[W]e find that the absence of any such time requirement in subsection 3802(d) [is] persuasive that the legislature did not envision a time limit on testing for the presence of controlled substances after driving.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-20· cited 132×
• Commonwealth v. Ali
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-03-05· cited 64×
• Commonwealth v. Trahey, T., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-22

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Segida
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29· cited 185×
• Commonwealth v. Griffith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-02· cited 118×
• Commonwealth v. Cahill
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-06-24· cited 46×
• Commonwealth v. Duda
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-31· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Kerry
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-23· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Spence
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-28· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Lark
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-09· cited 11×