Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/27/1998
Commonwealth v. Wilson
Citations
- 712 A.2d 735
- 551 Pa. 593
- 1998 Pa. LEXIS 874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant who flees after the commencement of trial waives his right to be present
- deciding that defendant who was present for one day of trial and absconded the next day, knowingly waived right to be present at trial
- deciding that defendant who was present for one day of trial and absconded the next day, knowingly waived right to be present at trial
- holding that when a defendant voluntarily absents himself from the trial proceedings without cause, he has waived his right to be present, and the trial court retains discretion to continue without delay
- holding that when a defendant voluntarily absents himself from the trial proceedings without cause, he has waived his right to be present, and the trial court retains discretion to continue without delay
- holding that when a defendant voluntarily absents himself from the 5 trial proceedings without cause, he has waived his right t~ be present, and the trial court retains discretion to continue without delay
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MallorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-02-19· cited 174×
- Commonwealth v. MichaudSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-11· cited 135×
- Commonwealth v. FloresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-02· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-15· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-04· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-16· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. VegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-01· cited 22×
- Pinkney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-06-15· cited 20×
- Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-31· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-20· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. HilburnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-08· cited 11×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 1,035×
- Rooney v. First Wisconsin National Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court· 1972-12-11· cited 214×
- United States v. John Tortora, United States of America v. Samuel SantoroSecond Circuit· 1972-07-24· cited 195×
- Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-22· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. SullensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-19· cited 60×
- Falk v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1899-12-05· cited 53×
- United States v. Joel Beltran-NunezFifth Circuit· 1983-09-22· cited 39×
- Jordan v. RocheSupreme Court· 1913-04-28· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. DiehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-06-28· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. BondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-23· cited 26×
- United States v. KroutFifth Circuit· 1995-06-16· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. GrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.