Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/6/1979
Commonwealth v. Clark
Citations
- 407 A.2d 28
- 267 Pa. Super. 513
- 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2549
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial in absentia was proper where defendant had been present for the empaneling of jury, but then absconded
- trial in absentia was proper where defendant was present for empaneling of jury, then absconded
- trial in absentia was proper where defendant was present for empaneling of jury, then absconded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cercone, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cer-Cone, Price, Van Voort, Spaeth, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-01-27· cited 461×
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-06-11· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. ConnollySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-28· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. DiehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-06-28· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. FeltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-06-14· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-10-09· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. GrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.