Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/12/2003

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Citations

824 A.2d 331
2003 Pa. Super. 191
2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that it had no jurisdiction to consider an untimely filed PCRA petition
noting sixty day period in subsection 9545(b)(2) begins to run from moment previously unknown fact was discovered
“Appellant’s failure to timely file his PCRA petition, and his failure to invoke any of the exceptions to the timeliness requirements of the PCRA, results in an untimely PCRA petition under any analysis.”
“Appellant’s failure to timely file his PCRA petition, and his failure to invoke any of the exceptions to the timeliness requirements of the PCRA, results in an untimely PCRA petition under any analysis.”
“Appellant’s failure to timely file his PCRA petition, and his failure to invoke any of the exceptions to the timeliness requirements of the PCRA, results in an untimely PCRA petition under any analysis.”
“Appellant’s failure to timely file his PCRA petition, and his failure to invoke any of the exceptions to the timeliness requirements of the PCRA, results in an untimely PCRA petition under any analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Elliott, Joyce, Stevens, Melvin, Lally-Green, Bender, Bowes, Graci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.