Skip to main content
· 12/9/2003

Commonwealth v. Voss

Citations

  • 838 A.2d 795
  • 2003 Pa. Super. 484
  • 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding PCRA time limits are jurisdictional in nature and apply generally to issues raising legality of sentence
  • holding appellant's PCRA must be denied because it was both untimely and failed to allege that any of the exceptions to the timeliness requirement applied
  • recognizing new statute and holding that, since the statute takes effect January 16, 1996, the operative deadline for first- time PCRA petitions is January 16, 1997
  • “Because the effective date of the amendments is January 16, 1996, the operative deadline for first-time PCRA petitions is January 16, 1997.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Graci, McEwen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.