Commonwealth v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that claims challenging discretionary aspects of sentencing are waived when the sentencing judge is not afforded the opportunity to reconsider or modify the sentence through a post-sentence motion or an objection at sentencing
• stating that claims challenging discretionary aspects of sentencing are waived when the sentencing judge is not afforded the opportunity to reconsider or modify the sentence through a post- sentence motion or an objection at sentencing
• stating that claims challenging discretionary aspects of sentencing are -4- J-S95044-16 waived when the sentencing judge is not afforded the opportunity to reconsider or modify the sentence though a post-sentence motion or an objection at sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Griffin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-06-24· cited 420×
• Commonwealth v. Berry
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-13· cited 245×
• Commonwealth v. Lawrence
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-27· cited 136×
• Commonwealth v. Stein
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-07· cited 14×
• Com. v. Lawrence, B
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-27

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• McMillan v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 1,908×
• Commonwealth v. Archer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-16· cited 183×
• Commonwealth v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-10· cited 177×
• Commonwealth v. Petaccio
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-13· cited 46×
• Commonwealth v. Jarvis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-24· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Barzyk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-04· cited 30×