Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

  • 958 A.2d 522
  • 2008 Pa. Super. 232
  • 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3057
  • 2008 WL 4380862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when the offenses stem from separate criminal acts, merger does not apply
  • noting when offenses arise from two different criminal acts, a merger analysis of the elements of the offense is not required
  • finding two counts of PWID did not merge because “facts underlying each crime are totally separate and constitute two different criminal acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panella, Shogan, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.