Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

  • 237 Pa. Super. 91
  • 346 A.2d 308
  • 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “there is no evidence whatsoever as to any attempt by appellant to conceal any weapon; and therefore, we must conclude that the evidence was insufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction as to Section 6106”
  • Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Hoffman, J., in which Spaeth, J. joined
  • Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Hoffman, J., in which Spaeth, J. joined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.