Commonwealth v. Montgomery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that concealment outside of the home is an element of Section 6106 that must be proven by the Commonwealth
• holding evidence that the defendant’s firearm was tucked into the waistband of his pants with the handle visible was sufficient to show concealment
• interpreting Scott Pa. Super. as holding that Section 6106 is not a strict liability provision and that the Commonwealth was required to prove that the defendant acted intentionally, knowingly or recklessly in concealing the firearm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Jordan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-05-29· cited 42×
• Com. v. Munson, H.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-08-13· cited 16×
• Com. v. Sinkiewicz, M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-04-05· cited 14×
• Com. v. Smith, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-10-11· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Montgomery, D., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-07-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Karetny
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-15· cited 162×
• Commonwealth v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-11-05· cited 117×
• Commonwealth v. Scott
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-08· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-28· cited 20×