Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

  • 301 N.E.2d 683
  • 364 Mass. 145
  • 1973 Mass. LEXIS 490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing § 33E relief where defendant, who carried no weapon, reacted with violence when discovered in robbery intended to be nonviolent such that \[t]he entire sequence reflect[ed] spontaneity rather than premeditation\
  • reducing verdict where defendants “intended to steal surreptitiously, not by violence, as in a robbery [, and] reacted with violence only when they were discovered in the act of the theft, which the deceased tried violently to thwart”
  • challenge to venire rejected in the absence of a showing of systematic exclusion even though only one of 121 persons examined was black
  • \Regard for the public interest impels us to use with restraint our power under § 33E to modify the jury's verdict\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro, Quirico, Braucher, Hennessey, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.