Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Wilcox

Citations

  • 456 A.2d 637
  • 310 Pa. Super. 331
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unauthorized use was necessarily an integral part of receiving stolen property and the two should have merged for sentencing
  • unauthorized use was necessarily an integral part of receiving stolen property and the two should have merged for sentencing
  • “Both Appellant’s flight and his collection of car keys are supportive of Appellant’s knowledge that the car was stolen.”
  • \Both Appellant's flight and his collection of car keys are supportive of Appellant's knowledge that the car was stolen.\
  • defendant was in exclusive possession of the vehicle stopped by police; a controlled substance was found in the cigarette case on the driver’s seat by the officer who took control of the car while another officer was chasing defendant
  • relied exclusively upon Davis, supra

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Hoffman, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.