Commonwealth v. Whyatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “there must be some showing that the witnesses not interviewed were equipped with information which might expand the admissible evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Litzenberger
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-09-07· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Camperson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-02· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Murray
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-30· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-08-09· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Mileshosky
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-28· cited 5×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 1,351×
• Commonwealth v. Mabie
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-06· cited 129×
• Commonwealth v. Badger
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 46×
• Commonwealth v. Barren
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-08· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Womack
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-30· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Barren
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-07· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Whyatt
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-06-24· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Yarbough
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Rainey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-11-07· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Adams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 12×