Commonwealth v. Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the collateral order doctrine did not apply in this context because a criminal defendant has a future remedy and his right to appeal would not be lost
• reiterating the importance of finality and preventing undue delay in PCRA proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shearer, D., Aplts. v. Hafer, S.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-01-18· cited 84×
• Commonwealth v. White
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-22· cited 74×
• Commonwealth v. Parker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-24· cited 39×
• Beltran v. Piersody
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-06· cited 35×
• BUCKNER-WEBB v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-09-20· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Magee
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-27· cited 15×
• Wayne M. Chiurazzi Law Inc. v. MRO Corp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-06-16· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Reading Group Two Properties, Inc.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-04· cited 7×
• Gerold v. Vehling
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-11· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Steckel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-29· cited 3×
• Chilutti, S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-07-19· cited 3×
• Chilutti, S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-10-12· cited 1×
• Colonial School District v. Montgomery County Bd. of Assessment Appeals ~ Appeal of: Metroplex West Assoc., L.P.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-05-28
• A.M.D. v. A.L.R, Aplts.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-10-18