Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/1/1997
Commonwealth v. Waltson
Citations
- 703 A.2d 518
- 1997 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3708
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “when there is probable cause to believe criminal activity is afoot in one room of a single unit household, a warrant to search the entire unit is not overbroad.”
- “Where there is probable cause to believe criminal activity is afoot in one room in a single unit household, a warrant to search the entire unit is not overbroad.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Hoffman, Sole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. KornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-05-25· cited 133×
- Commonwealth v. WaltsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-23· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. HuntingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-16· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. DougalewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-03-30· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-02-10· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-09-16
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-16· cited 308×
- Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-05· cited 301×
- Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-01-28· cited 91×
- Riojas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-10· cited 79×
- Madrid v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-31· cited 78×
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-11-21· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-13· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-18· cited 69×
- State v. HelmkaWashington Supreme Court· 1975-11-13· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. WeidenmoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-04-04· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. EicherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-29· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. MossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-20· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. YacoubianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-01· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. CopertinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-11-17· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. FioriniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-11-13· cited 29×
- State v. WeideMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-06-18· cited 22×
- In the Interest of WilksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-13· cited 12×
- State v. EgglerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-07-30· cited 11×
- Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-06· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.