Commonwealth v. Walls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence that the appellant repeatedly stabbed the victim causing cuts, scratches, and lacerations to the upper torso sufficient to sustain a conviction for aggravated assault
• holding evidence defendant stabbed victim causing cuts, scratches, and lacerations sufficient to sustain conviction for aggravated assault
• holding sentences for robbery at Section 3701(a)(1)(ii) and aggravate assault at Section 2702(a)(1) arising from same facts do not merge because each requires proof of an element which the other does not
• upholding conviction for aggravated assault when the evidence showed defendant repeatedly stabbed victim, causing cuts, scratches, and lacerations to victim’s upper torso
• finding sufficient evidence of aggravated assault where defendant stabbed victim multiple times with a screwdriver in the back, torso, neck, and head
• upholding a conviction for aggravated assault when the evidence showed that the appellant repeatedly stabbed the victim, causing cuts, scratches, and lacerations to the victim’s upper torso

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Ousley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-13· cited 481×
• Commonwealth v. Miller
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-17· cited 328×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Randall
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-01· cited 66×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-28· cited 62×
• Commonwealth v. Gatling
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-10-01· cited 54×
• Commonwealth v. Belsar
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-05-21· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Payne
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-02-15· cited 38×