Commonwealth v. Walls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• general supervisory and administrative authority over all the courts is vested solely in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania which alone may promulgate a new procedural rule or amend a present rule
• exclusive authority of Supreme Court to amend rules of procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Mason
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-03· cited 144×
• Commonwealth v. Musi
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-06· cited 132×
• Matter of Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-20· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Simmons
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-29· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-24· cited 21×
• Flowers v. Flowers
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-08· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. De George
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-03-07· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Bilhardt
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-24· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Yannariello
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-05· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Cherepko
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 1985-12-30

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Logan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-18· cited 33×