Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/14/1995
Commonwealth v. Walczak
Citations
- 655 A.2d 592
- 440 Pa. Super. 339
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 575
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that appellant’s initial appeal was quashed because appeal was from adjudication of guilt and judgment of sentence had not been imposed
- stating that “a fact-finder’s verdict of not guilty is accorded absolute finality. It is completely insulated from appellate review.” (citation and brackets omitted)
- stating that “a fact-finder’s verdict of not guilty is accorded absolute finality. It is completely insulated from appellate review.”
- stating that “a fact-finder’s verdict of not guilty is accorded absolute finality. It is completely insulated from appellate review.”
- stating that, in a criminal proceeding before a MDJ, “jeopardy attaches ... when the court begins to hear evidence. Thus, where a defendant has been found not guilty at trial, he may not be retried on the same offense.”
- stating that, in a criminal proceeding before a MDJ, “jeopardy attaches ... when the court begins to hear evidence. Thus, where a defendant has been found not guilty at trial, he may not be retried on the same offense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Del Sole, Kelly and Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. FeathersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-31· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. WintSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-13· cited 38×
- Geiger v. RouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-08· cited 25×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Ball III, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-28· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. HallCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-02· cited 12×
- Municipality of Anchorage v. BaxleyCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-11-19· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-12· cited 5×
- Taylorsville City v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2006-09-14· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. BallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-07-24· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. RocheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-23· cited 1×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,038×
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 557×
- Commonwealth v. KlobuchirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-06· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. RaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 66×
- Murphy v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-03· cited 56×
- Borough of West Chester v. LalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-13· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. AreltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-17· cited 24×
- MARINO BY MARINO v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-13· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. MaurizioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-17· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. TillmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-01· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. LyonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-03· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. Springbrook Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-16· cited 11×
- In re Appeal of Affected & Aggrieved Residents from the Adverse Action of the SupervisorsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-03· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.