Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 6/6/1979
Commonwealth v. Klobuchir
Citations
- 405 A.2d 881
- 486 Pa. 241
- 1979 Pa. LEXIS 598
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that issues, even of constitutional dimension, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
- refusing to address constitutional arguments regarding possible enhanced sentencing on ripeness grounds where defendant had not been convicted
- “[B]e-cause appellant stands unconvicted and unsentenced, the constitutionality of any enhanced sentence appellant might receive if convicted is a question not ripe for our review.”
- Nix, J., now Chief Justice Nix, Opinion in Support of Affirmance, joined by O'Brien and Larsen, JJ.
- Nix, J., now Chief Justice Nix, Opinion in Support of Affirmance, joined by O’Brien and Larsen, JJ.
- affirming by an equally divided court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Affirmance, Charges, Eagen, Exceed, Larsen, Manderino, Murder, Nix, O'Brien, Remand, Reversal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.