Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Klobuchir

Citations

  • 405 A.2d 881
  • 486 Pa. 241
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issues, even of constitutional dimension, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
  • refusing to address constitutional arguments regarding possible enhanced sentencing on ripeness grounds where defendant had not been convicted
  • “[B]e-cause appellant stands unconvicted and unsentenced, the constitutionality of any enhanced sentence appellant might receive if convicted is a question not ripe for our review.”
  • Nix, J., now Chief Justice Nix, Opinion in Support of Affirmance, joined by O'Brien and Larsen, JJ.
  • Nix, J., now Chief Justice Nix, Opinion in Support of Affirmance, joined by O’Brien and Larsen, JJ.
  • affirming by an equally divided court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Affirmance, Charges, Eagen, Exceed, Larsen, Manderino, Murder, Nix, O'Brien, Remand, Reversal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.