Commonwealth v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding unprovoked flight in a high crime area suffices to satisfy the Terry standard of reasonable suspicion
• “[T]he fact that Tucker was in a high crime area and fled when approached by the police provided the officers with reasonable suspicion to stop Tucker and conduct a Terry stop.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Collins
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-04· cited 96×
• Commonwealth v. Hayes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-05-01· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Emeigh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-08· cited 6×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Illinois v. Wardlow
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
• Commonwealth v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-09· cited 417×
• Commonwealth v. Cook
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-23· cited 242×
• Commonwealth v. Rogers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-05-27· cited 167×
• Commonwealth v. Peterson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-05· cited 89×
• Commonwealth v. Hawkins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-08-19· cited 86×
• Commonwealth v. Blair
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-13· cited 64×
• Commonwealth v. Rosas
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-19· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. Cottman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-13· cited 52×
• Commonwealth v. Witman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-28· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Wiley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-23· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Jefferson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-06-22· cited 30×