Commonwealth v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury entitled to infer penetration from six year old’s testimony that defendant made her “privacy” feel bad by lying on top of her
• jury entitled to infer penetration from six year old’s testimony that defendant made her “privacy” feel bad by lying on top of her
• sufficient evidence where jury entitled to infer penetration from six year old’s testimony that her “privacy” was made to feel bad, by evidence of defendant’s lubricating victim’s “private parts,” and by doctor’s testimony about injury to victim’s hymen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. King
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-09-29· cited 211×
• Getz v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-02-29· cited 204×
• Commonwealth v. Fowler
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-03-13· cited 44×
• Baynard v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1986-12-05· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Curtiss
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-01-09· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Baran
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-03-27· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Melchionno
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-08-22· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Moniz
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-08-26· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Legendre
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-02-04· cited 6×
• COMMONWEALTH v. CHRISTOPER F. HOIME.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2021-09-23· cited 4×