Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 3/13/2000

Commonwealth v. Fowler

Citations

431 Mass. 30
725 N.E.2d 199
2000 Mass. LEXIS 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Regarding the testimony of the Seattle detective, the issue was not properly preserved because the defendant objected ... on grounds other than the constitutional issue”
issue not properly preserved where defendant objected on different grounds from those pursued on appeal
issue not properly preserved because defendant objected on grounds other than those argued on appeal
defendant objected to testimony and to closing argument but not for reasons asserted on appeal
permissible to cross-examine defendant about what he neglected to tell officers when his post-Miranda statements varied from his trial testimony
unpreserved error concerning invocation of right to silence; court concluded there was no substantial likelihood of miscarriage of justice based solely on strength of Commonwealth’s case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.