Commonwealth v. Teixeira-Furtado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stop for speeding must be \supported by articulable facts sufficient to warrant a reasonably prudent person in the police officer's position in forming [the] conclusion\ that violation had occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Commonwealth v. Santana
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-05-03· cited 151×
• Commonwealth v. Thibeau
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-12-17· cited 123×
• Commonwealth v. Cruz
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-04-19· cited 110×
• Commonwealth v. Bacon
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-10-16· cited 106×
• Commonwealth v. Wren
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-04-19· cited 97×
• Commonwealth v. Torres
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-04-10· cited 96×
• Commonwealth v. Whynaught
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-01-03· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Quintos Q.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-06-15· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Twombly
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-11-30· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Gilday
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-01-07· cited 12×
• Selibedea v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1916-03-01· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-05-20· cited 6×