Commonwealth v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is clear, however, that the sentencing process is subject to the due process clause.”
• in view of recent invalidation of sentencing guidelines, trial court properly refused to apply the deadly weapon enhancement provision of the sentencing guidelines
• “the District Attorney’s office has the power to modify the information as it relates to the complaint (so long as the offense is substantially the same or cognate to the offense alleged in the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-10-19· cited 160×
• Commonwealth v. Walls
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-04-07· cited 74×
• Commonwealth v. Felix
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-14· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Wallace
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-25· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Ferrari
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-21· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Pickford
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-18· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Burns
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-17· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Wilson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-25· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Wilkins
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-01-06· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-10· cited 177×
• Commonwealth v. Sessoms
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-07· cited 159×
• Commonwealth v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-04· cited 26×