Commonwealth v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming consolidation of three knife-point robberies that occurred within a thirty-four-day period where the victims offered similar descriptions of the perpetrator
• upholding consolidation of three cases brought -7- J-S50001-18 against defendant for robbery because the similar criminal pattern employed and the high correlation between the details of the crimes indicated that all of the robberies were the handiwork of the same person

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dozzo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-03-16· cited 81×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-05-31· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Cain
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-08-12· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Fisher
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-14· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Ervin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-01· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Nelson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-12· cited 3×
• Com. v. Anthony, D.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-27