Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/1/1997
Commonwealth v. Ervin
Citations
- 691 A.2d 966
- 456 Pa. Super. 782
- 1997 Pa. Super. LEXIS 586
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that mere omission of issue from statement does not automatically result in waiver; rather, Superior Court will address merits of any issue in criminal case whenever certified record is sufficient to conduct meaningful appellate review
- holding that mere omission of issue from statement does not automatically result in waiver; rather, Superior Court will address merits of any issue in criminal case whenever certified record is sufficient to conduct meaningful appellate review
- “When the certified record is sufficient to permit us to review an ineffectiveness claim raised for the first time on direct appeal, we need not remand for an evidentiary hearing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Hoffman, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 208×
- Commonwealth v. ErvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-29· cited 107×
- Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-10-27· cited 11×
- In the Interest of A.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-10· cited 9×
- In Re AJSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-10
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-23· cited 541×
- Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-05· cited 291×
- Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-30· cited 206×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-22· cited 204×
- Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-30· cited 133×
- Commonwealth v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-04-05· cited 123×
- Homrich v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-02-20· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. DouglasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-03· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-22· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-28· cited 71×
- Gosier v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1995-10-02· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-21· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-10· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. ArchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-15· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-03-24· cited 48×
- Jermyn v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1994-01-10· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. RompillaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-23· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-08· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. JermynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-02-19· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. McGillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-19· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.