Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/26/2007
Commonwealth v. Strader
Citations
- 931 A.2d 630
- 593 Pa. 421
- 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1984
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “the apparent authority exception turns on whether the facts available to police at that moment would lead a person of reasonable caution to believe the consenting third party had authority over the premises.”
- finding officers reasonably believed occupant of apartment had apparent authority to consent to search where occupant answered door, spoke with police, stated he had authority to control who entered apartment, and agreed to let police enter
- apparent authority does not frustrate the \enhanced notion of privacy\ embodied in art. I, § 8, of Pennsylvania Constitution
- “A third party with apparent authority over the area to be searched may provide police with consent to search.”
- warrantless seizure presumptively unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment subject to a few specifically established, well-delineated exceptions, such as when it is consensual, Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128, 110 S.Ct. 2301, 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990)
- warrantless seizure presumptively unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment subject to a few specifically established, well-delineated exceptions, such as when it is consensual, Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128, 110 S.Ct. 2301, 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cappy, Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-07-17· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. Adams, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-03-26· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. PerelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-23· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. PORTER P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-03-11· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. GrahameSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-11-17· cited 45×
- Com. v. Rosario, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-03-23· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. BaskingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-04-14· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-31· cited 20×
- Com. v. Hawkins, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-12-10· cited 15×
- Com. v. Lehnerd, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-04-05· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. GrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-05-13· cited 10×
- State v. BuieConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-07-05· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. GrahameSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-04-18· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-09-16
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-04· cited 776×
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-30· cited 478×
- In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-10-18· cited 270×
- Commonwealth v. NesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-25· cited 199×
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-25· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. GaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-27· cited 63×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.