Commonwealth v. Stoner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an odor may be sufficient to establish probable cause for a search of an automobile, which had been legitimately stopped for an unrelated vehicle code violation
• explaining that “plain smell” is a concept that is analogized to “plain view” to establish - 13 - J-S68009-14 probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Reppert
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-10· cited 239×
• In re B.R.
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2011-07-28

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Minnesota v. Dickerson
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
• United States v. Santana
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 1,382×
• Commonwealth v. Edmunds
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-04· cited 776×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-23· cited 177×
• Commonwealth v. Cortez
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-18· cited 155×
• United States v. Michael Terry Curran
  Ninth Circuit· 1974-05-28· cited 85×
• Commonwealth v. Trenge
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-01· cited 82×
• Commonwealth v. Stoner
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 68×
• Commonwealth v. Govens
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-10-28· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Silo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-12· cited 44×
• In the Interest of B.C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-10· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Fink
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-24· cited 32×
• Commonwealth v. Dorsey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-09· cited 21×