Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/24/1997
Commonwealth v. Stewart
Citations
- 690 A.2d 195
- 547 Pa. 277
- 1997 Pa. LEXIS 425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that compelled production of documents for in camera review, and discovery of documents deemed relevant and non‑privileged, does not impermissibly intrude upon exercise of religious beliefs and practices even though documents were confidential under canon law
- holding that compelled production of documents for in camera review, and discovery of documents deemed relevant and non-privileged, does not impermissibly intrude upon exercise of religious beliefs and practices even though documents were confidential under canon law
- holding that compelled production of documents for in camera review, and discovery of documents deemed relevant and non-privileged, does not impermissibly intrude upon exercise of religious beliefs and practices even though documents were confidential under canon law
- observing that application of clergyman privilege “is not based solely on the clergy’s status, but whether the communication was made in confidence in the context of a penitential or spiritual matter”
- observing “[e]xceptions to the demand for every man’s evidence are not lightly created nor expansively construed, for they are in derogation of the search for truth.”
- observing “[e]xceptions to the demand for every man's evidence are not lightly created nor expansively construed, for they are in derogation of the search for truth.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Former
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-04· cited 138×
- Gillard v. AIG InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-02-23· cited 85×
- G. BouSamra, M.D. v. Excela Health, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-06-18· cited 65×
- Joe v. Prison Health Services, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-09-25· cited 56×
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-01-20· cited 55×
- In re Thirty-third Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-18· cited 53×
- Thomas v. CorbettCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-29· cited 43×
- Red Vision Systems, Inc. v. National Real Estate Information Services, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-01-13· cited 39×
- Reginelli v. Marcellus Boggs, M.D., Monongahela Valley Hosp., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-03-27· cited 38×
- Africa v. HornCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-30· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. SpetzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-31· cited 32×
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-07-25· cited 27×
- Com. v. Cook, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-07· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-30· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. Mejia-AriasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-14· cited 24×
- Octave ex rel. Octave v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-30· cited 21×
- In Re Subpoena No. 22.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-02· cited 18×
- Koken v. One Beacon InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-28· cited 18×
- ROMAN CATH. ARCHBISHOP OF LA v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2005-07-25· cited 15×
- Joyner v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-22· cited 12×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 3,250×
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 2,650×
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court· 1990-04-17· cited 2,569×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 1,217×
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 1,085×
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaThird Circuit· 1990-10-29· cited 99×
- Reverend W. Eugene Scott, Phd. v. Joel RosenbergNinth Circuit· 1983-04-22· cited 68×
- Bernard and Odette Port v. Jack Heard, Sheriff of Harris County, TexasFifth Circuit· 1985-07-01· cited 61×
- Hutchison v. LuddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-24· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-06· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. CodySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-04· cited 31×
- Scott v. HammockUtah Supreme Court· 1994-03-04· cited 22×
- Muslim v. FrameE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-06-30· cited 17×
- Fahlfeder v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-02· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-02· cited 9×
- Sherman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1926-01-18· cited 4×
- In re Morrill-Mascott Co.D. Massachusetts· 1923-02-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.