Commonwealth v. Stancil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “revocation -7- J-S32012-22 hearings must be held with reasonable promptness after a probation officer is chargeable with knowing that probation has been violated”
• explaining that “revocation hearings must be held with reasonable promptness after a probation officer is chargeable with knowing that probation has been violated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Wright
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-05-08· cited 95×
• Commonwealth v. Mullins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-03-26· cited 70×
• State v. Hernandez
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2007-04-20· cited 9×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 1,351×
• Commonwealth v. Clemmons
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-28· cited 135×
• Commonwealth v. Floyd
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-20· cited 110×
• Commonwealth v. Mourar
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-21· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. McCain
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-28· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Gochenaur
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-08-10· cited 16×