Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/3/2014
Commonwealth v. Spotz
Citations
- 99 A.3d 866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no right to hybrid representation; pro se briefs and motions filed by counseled defendant’s are not typically considered
- “Pennsylvania has a policy against ‘hybrid’ representation, that is, we typically do not consider the merits of pro se briefs or motions filed by counseled defendants.”
- Single Justice Opinion on Post-Decision al Motions by Castille, C.J.
- Single Justice Opinion on Post-Decisional Motions by Castille, C.J.
- Single Justice Opinion on Post-Decisional Motions by Castille, C.J.
- Single Justice Opinion on Post-Decisional Motions by Castille, C.J.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Castille
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-29· cited 395×
- Commonwealth v. Spotz, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-18· cited 262×
- Commonwealth v. Eichinger, J., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-31· cited 169×
- Proceeding before the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia v. JohnsonThird Circuit· 2015-06-12· cited 112×
- Commonwealth v. Davido, T., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-15· cited 76×
- Commonwealth, Aplt v. Williams, T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-15· cited 54×
- In Re: Commonwealth's Motion v.Third Circuit· 2015-06-12
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court· 2011-04-04· cited 5,931×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 4,115×
- Knowles v. MirzayanceSupreme Court· 2009-03-24· cited 2,888×
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court· 2000-02-23· cited 2,810×
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,718×
- Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 1,094×
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-29· cited 764×
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-30· cited 731×
- Commonwealth v. AliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-29· cited 675×
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-09· cited 553×
- Harbison v. BellSupreme Court· 2009-04-01· cited 531×
- Bobby v. Van HookSupreme Court· 2009-11-09· cited 514×
- Commonwealth v. RoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-30· cited 496×
- Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-24· cited 419×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.