Commonwealth v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “while the Commonwealth bears the burden of proving adherence to the Miranda rules, it is not required to make that showing unless the defendant challenges compliance with those rules”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Festa
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-01-05· cited 60×
• Commonwealth v. Pope
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1983-03-23· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Burke
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1978-11-27· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Hunt
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-12-12· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Mott
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1977-04-13· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Commonwealth v. McKenna
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1969-02-05· cited 107×
• People v. Williams
  California Supreme Court· 1969-07-07· cited 72×
• Commonwealth v. Harris
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1973-11-02· cited 55×
• People v. Cox
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-02-11· cited 8×